Backblogged!!

"Out of the overflow of the heart, the mouth speaks."

Space Dust in the Wind February 23, 2012

Filed under: Through a Glass Darkly — camcat888 @ 4:46 pm
Tags: , , , ,

Religious people constantly face criticism for “blind faith” or for putting hope in things that can’t be seen or proven.  And that would be understandable, if not for those widely-held scientific theories such as the “Big Bang” or “evolution.”  People who do not believe in a divine “Creator God” usually accept one or both of these explanations as to “how we got here.”  But atheists conveniently overlook the fact that their criticism of “faith” is equally true for their own beliefs:  they can’t be proven.  Sure, they’ll point to evidence they can see and touch and measure, but scientifically speaking, in order to be “proven” it must be recreated in a laboratory, and last I checked, neither evolution nor the Big Bang has yet to pass that test.  As far as evidence, I can just as credibly attribute everything I see and hear and taste and touch around me to a God who created it all.  On this, we’ll agree to disagree.  What unites humanity is the deep-seated quest for the meaning of it all – our purpose, our destiny, why any of us are here.  This desire/dilemma is universal, and though we may disagree about how we got here, we all desperately want to know what we are supposed to do now that we are here.  However, addressing the question of “why” inevitably brings us back to the question of “how.”

I’ll start with the religious doctrine of a “divine creator,”[i] which to me is as real and true as the grass under my feet or the heart beating in my chest.  I believe that this world – and any other world – had a beginning, when God spoke it into existence.  Whether that looked (to a fly on the wall of the cosmos) like swirling clouds of gases and particles or involved a “BANG” is no more relevant than it is determinable.  The important thing is that I know my God designed, built and currently sustains his creation for intricately detailed and infallible purposes to be fulfilled.  As a Christian, I am compelled (actually, commanded) to live every day with the certainty that I am supposed to be here, now, and for a reason.  Admittedly, in the nitty gritty of life, it’s difficult to always identify exactly what I’m meant to be doing or why, but I am thoroughly convinced that my God knows and directs my path according to his plans.  My existence has meaning and purpose, and an all-powerful and loving God will see that even my missteps are useful in his grand design.

As for the scientific sort, they have altogether rejected the idea of a “creator” but also undeniably (though perhaps secretly) seek meaning and direction in life.  Unfortunately, this is contradictory at its root.  Let me illustrate.  While driving home from work one day, you merge into a lane without seeing the large SUV in your blind spot.  You are seriously injured and the other driver is killed trying to avoid the collision.  Your best friend visits you in the hospital and says, “what did you mean by wrecking that car?  Did you want to kill that driver?  And what did you plan to do in the hospital?”  If this sounds absolutely mad, that’s because it should.  You didn’t mean to kill anyone or hurt yourself or total your car: it was an accident.  Similarly, if you believe that we – people, plants, animals, and everything else on earth – just exploded into being due to some one-in-a-gazillion coincidence of gas and particles combining by accident, then there can be no further discussion of “the meaning of life.”  We are just glorified space dust and nothing more.  There are no rules (other than science), since dust has no morality.  Our existence is a runaway train that can have neither purpose nor order, and our lives are just a series of accidents – some happy, some tragic, but all unplanned, unavoidable and ultimately pointless.  Fun stuff, right?

It’s known as existentialism, and if you read any of the philosophers who avow it, you’ll notice unmistakable signs that they also ache to be proven wrong.  No one honestly wants to believe that life is meaningless, so why does anyone do it?  I think some people affirm existentialism because they want to live selfishly and without accountability.  Others are afraid of being “duped” by religion – what they would claim is a false-hope.  But for most, I suspect they have bought into evolutional science without ever considering what it actually means for their lives.  They would assert that they have individual purposes (based on what nebulous principles, I couldn’t guess), but the end result is that when they are unsuccessful or suffer or die, there can be no conclusion other than that their lives were miserable failures.  There is no second chance, no redemption, no greater plan: space dust blows about on the winds of fate and chance, and when it dissipates, that’s the end.  Makes for a great children’s story, doesn’t it?  Millions of non-religious folks can tell their kids before bedtime that tomorrow is a new day, with pain and sorrow, death and destruction, sacrifice and loss – accident after accident – and then they die.  Sweet dreams, kids!

Nobody wants to be naïve or hopeful without merit, but that’s usually because they can’t convince themselves it isn’t simply feel-good fluff.  I have heard it said that religious people – with belief in a sovereign God – are just puppets on a theocratic string, but even to acknowledge that would be giving partial credence to the existence of a God.  They have argued that they would rather be in control of their own destinies than to affirm a divine Being.  Yet what is evolution but a scientific puppetmaster?  You are merely part of a grand science experiment, with no discernible hypothesis and no say in the matter.  Love, trust, hope, kindness, and all other virtues are only chemicals and dust on a whim.  If the atheists are right and I am wrong, then when I die, I will know nothing of it and the worst they can do is stand on my grave proclaiming my foolishness (which they may do to their hearts’ content with my expressed permission).  I will have lived my life full of hope and faith and belief in something eternal, and much greater than myself, and even if this be all, I will have lived more richly due to my ignorance.  But if they are wrong, not only will they have foregone real, defensible purpose and meaning in life, but they also stand to face that Creator whom they denied, and to lose more than they could have ever imagined.  Their tombstones will read:  “Here lies an atheist – who lived for nothing but surely died without being taken in.

As long as I have breath, I will declare that there is a God, who designs purpose for all of his creation and who will not be thwarted by those who refuse to accept him.  I will believe that there is meaning even for the atheists, although it cannot be for their good since they won’t serve God’s purposes willingly.  One can swear that there’s no such thing as “wind” because they have never seen it, but that will never affect its reality or the way it flutters the leaves and cools your skin on a hot day.  Live with hope – tangible, foundational hope that doesn’t require a trick of the mind to believe.  If your heart longs to know why you’re here and how your life can be meaningful, seek the God who created you and everything else and who has loved you enough to convince you of that very thing.


[i] It should be noted that I only believe in God the Creator as he is set forth in the Bible – nothing more and nothing less.  The purpose of this particular blog, however, is to point out one of the many flaws and lunacies of believing in no God at all.  If you happen to read this and are left feeling overwhelmingly empty, ask me about my God and how he can change all that in an instant.

 

Fanny-Fanny-Boo-Boo February 2, 2012

Filed under: HE-COULD-GO-ALL-THE-WAY!! — camcat888 @ 1:37 pm
Tags: ,

In the world of sports – professional and collegiate – there is a widely held belief that if you follow/support/watch/root for a certain team (particularly a local one), you must follow/support/watch/root for said team for better or worse, till death do you part, regardless of the team’s relevance or viability.  Don’t misunderstand me:  there’s something to be said for loyalty.  Nobody likes a “bandwagoner” or a “fair weather fan,” and abandoning a team merely because they have one losing season (or even multiple losing seasons) is frowned upon with good reason.  However, there exists a glaring double standard between what is expected of sports fans and what is acceptable for the athletes.  Players follow the money, the contract, and the fame, with little – if any – concern for their current team’s chemistry, its fan base or its home city, while a fan is quickly labeled a “sellout” should he get fed up and pledge his loyalty elsewhere.  Garbage, I say.  Garbage.

For the proper context, let’s examine the role of sports in the world, which can be summarized in one word:  entertainment.  Just like television, movies, books, hobbies, and any other pastime, sports teams are popular because they provide entertainment for spectators.  People like competition; they like excitement; they enjoy the thrill of watching athletes pursue victory; they identify with the players who have great skill, but also with those who have guts and a heart for the game (ideally, a nice balance of skill and heart).  But at the end of the day, we must admit that they aren’t curing cancer or feeding the hungry or even providing goods or services that we can’t live without (I don’t relish the thought of a life without sports, but I’m sure I would survive).  Thus, it is perfectly reasonable to compare sports to television shows or movies or books – we like them because they keep us pleasantly engaged, and that’s about it.

I live in a city with a relatively new NBA franchise, which has been consistent since its inception.  Consistently awful, that is.  In 10 years, they’ve changed players, coaches and owners so often that I’ve lost track of who is who of what.  The only thing that hasn’t changed is their absolute inability to win basketball games.  This team came to us along with a giant behemoth of an arena which city residents voted against, but which was built nonetheless.  The tickets are overpriced and the games are virtually unwatchable, yet some people insist that because I live in this city, I am somehow obligated to cheer for and patronize this terrible team.  To that, I reply [***crude farting noise with hand against mouth***]!!  My money buys game tickets (or doesn’t), buys team merchandise (or doesn’t), and pays for the massive, half-empty arena (ok, they tax me for that, so I don’t have a choice) – my money funds a team that has actually gotten worse since its inception, and has yet to give me one single compelling reason to make myself a “fan.”  And that throws me into the category of a “sellout”?  Ha!  I’m no more a sellout than any of this team’s home games, so put that in your court and dunk it…that is, if you can find the basket.

I did state earlier that one shouldn’t forsake a team merely because they aren’t winning championships, with “merely” being the key word.  No team will be awesome all the time, and some people unfairly bail on their team after a few bad games or a few losing seasons.  For what it is worth, fan loyalty can be a beautiful thing.  But it comes back to this general concept of entertainment:  if I’m watching players I know and love, and who have devoted themselves to this city and its franchise, I can easily persevere with them through the rough patches.  Then again, if I’m watching players who come and go wherever the money takes them, clearly having no dedication to the team, the area, or its fans, I’m hard-pressed to stay tuned even if they are decent…and downright crazy to do so if they suck.  Similarly, if I’m watching team owners hoard their money year after year, repeatedly refusing to make wise trades or necessary acquisitions because they are tightwads, I believe that I am besmirching both the sport and my city by patronizing lackluster efforts and impure motives. 

It is the market which drives the entertainment industry, and sports fans may be inadvertently encouraging teams to become complacent and out of touch, resting on the assumption that their “die hard fans” will stick with them (i.e., tirelessly continue funding their shenanigans) indiscriminately.  So when a food supplier replaces a quality product with a crappy one, am I “disloyal” to switch brands?  What about when popular TV shows suddenly cast new actors to portray main characters, or hire new script writers who just don’t stack up to the originals?  (I mean, is anyone still watching Two and a Half Men?)  That’s the way the market works:  suppliers must meet the demand of their patrons, and if they begin slacking, sales will decline.  At that point, they either choose to comply or fade into oblivion.  Nothing about the world of sports should be any different.  Money talks, folks; don’t bind and gag yours in the name of dogged “loyalty.”

Like it or not, I think outside the box on every topic that is worth my time to think on at all.  You should do the same.  Ask yourself whether the members of “your team” (players, owners, etc.) are as committed to you as you are to them.  Ask what the nebulous entity that is the [insert intimidating creature mascot name] organization has done to deserve your unconditional support.  Consider why attaching your faithful fanaticism to an individual player and following him throughout his career is really so far-fetched?  Reject the idea that any source of “entertainment” can command your unwavering fidelity, should it degenerate into an irritating, unwatchable source of heartburn and hangovers.  Most importantly, decide whether you are perpetuating mediocrity by allowing a team to presuppose your undying loyalty. 

I truly admire fans who have unapologetically both celebrated and cried with a specific team over the course of many years.  I appreciate those who grew up with certain franchises as a household religion which has been passed down through generations.  I have no beef with passionate supporters of “America’s Team” or any other long-standing, routinely competitive organization because the reality is that every team boasting such title or reputation is ultimately committed to the pursuit of excellence – even if they sometimes fall short.  In this, however, all sports teams are not created equal, and therefore they are not equally deserving of fan loyalty.  Identify whether you are voluntarily funding a team without leadership, motivation or character, and know when it’s time to cut your losses.  So don’t be a bandwagoner or a fair weather fan.  But don’t be a gullible chump, either.

 

 
Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 490 other followers